New #abstractimpressionism dweets

function u(t) {

c.width=1920 // clear the canvas
for(i=0;i<9;i++)
x.fillRect(400+i*100+S(t)*300,400,50,200) // draw 50x200 rects

} // 122/140

Please log in (or register) to post a dweet (copy-paste the code somewhere safe to save it meanwhile)


    u(t) is called 60 times per second.
    t: Elapsed time in seconds.
    S: Shorthand for Math.sin.
    C: Shorthand for Math.cos.
    T: Shorthand for Math.tan.
    R: Function that generates rgba-strings, usage ex.: R(255, 255, 255, 0.5)
    c: A 1920x1080 canvas.
    x: A 2D context for that canvas.

Try the new frontend: beta.dwitter.net
Current theme challenge: #Opposites

show FPS hide FPS share fullscreen

taupelink

remix of d/22713 by u/taupelink

function u(t) {

for(i=g=270;--i;x.fillRect(g*X,g*Y,e/(d=4**t),-i/d))f=g*i*t,e=(f*f%2)**8,X=e*e%7,Y=X*f%4,x.fillStyle=R(e,e^=e+C(e/g)*i,e*=5%C(Y/7)*Y,i/Y**5)

May 6 2021 4:34 PM UTC

}// 140/140

Please log in (or register) to post as a new dweet (copy-paste code somewhere safe to save it meanwhile).

d/22723

Show more comments…
u/tomxor

Is everyone percieving the same thing? it's both abstract and specific for me.
u/taupelink

for what it's worth, i was going for "reeds at the water's edge." not when i began, mind you...just at some point while i was experimenting, it started looking a little like that, and i coaxed it further in that direction :)
u/taupelink

(not perfect, obvs...the water is kinda churning at its edge, and the green isn't especially natural-looking. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ )
u/C010011012

so good
u/tomxor

Yup, "reeds at the water's edge." is what I see too, I like how it seems to remain very abstract at the same time as being detailed and specific.
u/tomxor

I suspect #abstract-impressionism might be the correct definition? I'm insufficiently educated in art to be sure.
u/tomxor

hashtag fail, #abstractimpressionism
u/tomxor

Similarly: d/22568

You've reached the end.

dwitter.net | #abstractimpressionism